2 of 2
2
Long, rambling preview of where Brainsturbator 2.0 is headed. 
Posted: 03 November 2008 07:40 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 16 ]
Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  283
Joined  2007-05-11

Your the one putting boundaries on it as science. Information has no boundaries.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 November 2008 10:13 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 17 ]
Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  111
Joined  2007-11-01

Well the link I gave states that Dr. Lynda Frassetto considers the amount of potassium sold in the product mentioned to not be enough.  So I searched her name and potassium and got another paper referencing her, stating:

For example, calcium, potassium and protein intakes were two to three times higher than current intake levels, while sodium intake was seven times lower. These diets were balanced high protein, high mineral, high phyto-nutrient, alkalizing diets. Overall, infact, researchers report that 87% of likely prehistoric diets provided an excess of base while contemporary Westernized diets provide an excess of acid (8).

Abe: All language is based on left-brain dominance but what I write about is using MUSIC, nonwestern music, as a model. So silence is not just mysticism but it’s based on LISTENING and repeating I-I-I is based on logical inference which is the left-brain explanation of the process of listening: an OPEN structure into pure consciousness. More importantly the nonwestern music model relies on complementary opposites whereas phonetic-based language relies on symmetry. So even logical inference—the I-I—as Ramana Maharshi calls it—is relying on symmetry. Ramana Maharshi is what Zizek terms a VANISHING MEDIATOR because he relied on the Brahmin tradition yet he also transcended it. Ramakrishna is another example which is why there’s still academic books, like Jeff Kirpals, arguing for a subversive WESTERN interpretative of Ramakrishna, etc.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 November 2008 09:28 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 18 ]
Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  92
Joined  2007-08-12

Comments in that article are too fascinating. Haven’t digged it yet, but i post a cool one for the record:

Well, I am remembering DeGrazie/Milton book where instead of accreation (in another decade nobody will believe in accreation anymore just like this scientist who says that 10 years ago he didn’t believe this flux event was possible) in which they propose that the sun novaed (which Dr O Manuel at Rolla MO university has shown to be true) and in doing so created one humungeous blob of solar ejecta which was connected to the sun by a tube of magnetic flux and stayed that way, the ejected material itself parted and the ‘planets’ formed while in the magnetic flux tube, which has been weakening ever since, now almost gone.

Consider the discoveries of sun/planetary systems consist of primarily the sun/one large ‘planet.’ Does this mean this event is the precurser of multi-planetary systems such as ours?

 Signature 

do what tao wilt and there will be no law

Profile
 
 
   
2 of 2
2
 
‹‹ Is America Too Big to Fail?      Slow Light ››