running tactical notes
Posted: 19 September 2007 02:55 PM   [ Ignore ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  1896
Joined  2006-09-25

As Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises warned his anti-Communist colleagues in the 1950s: “An anti-something movement displays a purely negative attitude. It has no chance whatever to succeed. Its passionate diatribes virtually advertise the program they attack. People must fight for something that they want to achieve, not simply reject an evil, however bad it may be.”

Improvised Weapons:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Improvised_weapons
Wiki.
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/07/improvised_weap.html
Bruce Schneier.

Network Culture
http://varnelis.net/network_culture

Profile
 
 
Posted: 26 March 2008 03:07 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Welcome
Avatar
Rank
Total Posts:  8
Joined  2008-03-22

Well.  Rejection of evil is a good place to start.  It’s the way some of the best public policy works.  Not aiming to establish some new, higher, ideal or good.  Simply dealing with the worst of the worst.  Yes.  Beyond “advertising” and “programs” and “displays”.  Fighting evil is a damned fine place to start.

 Signature 

“Don’t annoy us further, for we have our work to do.  Just think about the average:  what use have they for you?  Another toy that helped destroy the elder race of man.  Forget about your silly whim.  It doesn’t fit the plan.” Rush 2112

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 May 2008 02:07 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  1896
Joined  2006-09-25

Close Quarters Battle:

http://www.cqb-team.com/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Close-quarters_battle

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Grozny_(1994-1995)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_occupation_of_Fallujah

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 May 2008 07:00 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  1896
Joined  2006-09-25

Running an experiment in re-shuffling and re-mixing 5GW concepts:

http://invisiblexperiment.blogspot.com/

LEVERAGE, SYSTEMPUNKTS, INVISIBILE WAR

12 Leverage Points, by Donella Meadows
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twelve_leverage_points

SWOT Analysis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis

LPM - Leverage Point Modeling, pentagon sim version of SWOT for budget purposes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leverage_Point_Modeling

Rejecting Theory

Networks can also be viewed as cages and constraints.  We learn the history of “who thought what when” and wind up with biographies instead of pure concepts.  Robert Anton Wilson is not 8-circuit theory, is not e-prime, is not quantum psychology.  The individual concepts are more important, and they need to be separated from the metadata.  If you understand the OODA loop you don’t need to recognize the name “John Boyd.”

It’s also important to consider that ideas are always cropping up in multiple places at once, always falling into obscurity, always being repeated, and always new to somebody, somewhere. 

Plus, in the field of war, sun tzu already said everything and I’m too stubborn to admit it.

Little Brother Material

How to Kill RFID chips:
http://www.instructables.com/id/How-to-blockkill-RFID-chips/

Encrypt your Gmail:
http://www.instructables.com/id/Encrypt-your-Gmail-Email/

How to Start a Flash Mob:
http://www.instructables.com/id/How-to-Start-A-Flash-Mob/

Profile
 
 
Posted: 19 May 2008 11:31 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  1896
Joined  2006-09-25

5GW Theory collection:

John Boyd:
http://www.d-n-i.net/dni/john-r-boyd/

Modern Warfare dot org (excellence)
http://modern-warfare.org/

Initiating 5GW:
http://www.phaticcommunion.com/archives/2006/03/initiating_5gw.php

The Role of Cities:
http://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/globalguerrillas/2006/10/the_role_of_cit.html

John Robb’s 5GW thinkpiece:
http://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/globalguerrillas/2006/10/the_changing_fa.html

Superempowered Individuals and 5GW:
http://zenpundit.com/?p=2607

Politics and Warfare:
http://www.dreaming5gw.com/2007/10/politics_and_imperatives.php

TDAXP:
5GW networks
http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/07/29/dreaming-5gw-part-iv-5th-generation-networks.html
dream of 5GW:
http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/07/31/dreaming-5gw-part-vi-dream-of-5gw.html
kinds of 5GW:
http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/08/01/kinds-of-5gw.html

Barnett vs. Robb pissing match:
http://www.thomaspmbarnett.com/weblog/2006/10/a_thousand_flowers_will_bloom.html

and intel for 6gw:
http://kentsimperative.blogspot.com/2007/10/intelligence-for-sixth-generation.html

THE DARKNET MODEL

http://www.dreaming5gw.com/2007/11/darknet_a_model_for_5gw_organi.php

While 5GW still remains largely speculative, there is one important current “closed-source” network we can examine: the “darknet.”
THE CHANGING FACE OF ILLICIT CONTENT DISTRIBUTION

In 2002, a group of Microsoft engineers published a paper titled “The Darknet and the Future of Content Distribution.” In the paper, the Microsoft engineers examined the evolution of illicit copyright networks. I separate each different linear evolution using the generational framework.

* 1st Generation: Small-scale copying in small, informal networks. Because of the technological limitations of cassette copiers and pre-1990s computers and the lack of widespread distribution mechanisms, copying was limited to small groups of friends, family, and acquaintances.

* 2nd Generation: Digital revolution enables large-scale copying and distribution of music. Copying involves users downloading from centralized databases of MP3 files, often hosted on college and university networks and ISPs. However, these are easily detected and disabled.

* 3rd Generation: Napster improves on the centralized database by creating a decentralized peer-to-peer (P2P) interface. By creating a distributed network of users sharing copyrighted content, Napster increases the scale of content distribution and lessens legal liability. However, Napster was not totally immune from the reach of the law. It maintained a maintained a centralized database with a searchable file index, making it liable for its users’ actions

* 4th Generation: Gnutella becomes the dominant mode of P2P distribution. Unlike Napster, it is totally decentralized. All one needs to download content is the IP address of another user, it is not run by any one individual or company, and it has substantial legal uses.  However, in practice, 4th generation P2P networks are not totally decentralized. A small group of users provides the vast majority of the content while the rest leech of them. These users have become the targets of record company lawsuits, as the RIAA hopes to take down the network by attacking its nodes.

* 5th Generation: A return to the informal distribution networks of 1st generation, with informal networks of friends and acquaintances distributing files among each other. As long as they do not share with strangers, they are largely undetectable by media companies. Content diffuses from larger aggregate “super-users” to smaller networks—both consisting of informal friend/family groupings and encrypted invitation only file sharing networks. The chief innovation of this distribution method is that it largely guarantees user anonymity. Additionally, as the Microsoft engineers observed, it is hard to control individual dissemination of copyrighted material once it spreads from the “super-users” to smaller networks.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 26 May 2008 09:00 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  1896
Joined  2006-09-25

How to Grow Plastic-Eating Microbes.

source: http://cryptogon.com/?p=2634

First, he ground plastic bags into a powder. Next, he used ordinary household chemicals, yeast and tap water to create a solution that would encourage microbe growth. To that, he added the plastic powder and dirt. Then the solution sat in a shaker at 30 degrees.

After three months of upping the concentration of plastic-eating microbes, Burd filtered out the remaining plastic powder and put his bacterial culture into three flasks with strips of plastic cut from grocery bags. As a control, he also added plastic to flasks containing boiled and therefore dead bacterial culture.

Six weeks later, he weighed the strips of plastic. The control strips were the same. But the ones that had been in the live bacterial culture weighed an average of 17 per cent less.

That wasn’t good enough for Burd. To identify the bacteria in his culture, he let them grow on agar plates and found he had four types of microbes. He tested those on more plastic strips and found only the second was capable of significant plastic degradation.

Next, Burd tried mixing his most effective strain with the others. He found strains one and two together produced a 32 per cent weight loss in his plastic strips. His theory is strain one helps strain two reproduce.

Tests to identify the strains found strain two was Sphingomonas bacteria and the helper was Pseudomonas.

A researcher in Ireland has found Pseudomonas is capable of degrading polystyrene, but as far as Burd and his teacher Mark Menhennet know — and they’ve looked — Burd’s research on polyethelene plastic bags is a first.

Next, Burd tested his strains’ effectiveness at different temperatures, concentrations and with the addition of sodium acetate as a ready source of carbon to help bacteria grow.

At 37 degrees and optimal bacterial concentration, with a bit of sodium acetate thrown in, Burd achieved 43 per cent degradation within six weeks.

The plastic he fished out then was visibly clearer and more brittle, and Burd guesses after six more weeks, it would be gone. He hasn’t tried that yet.

To see if his process would work on a larger scale, he tried it with five or six whole bags in a bucket with the bacterial culture. That worked too.

Industrial application should be easy, said Burd. “All you need is a fermenter . . . your growth medium, your microbes and your plastic bags.”

The inputs are cheap, maintaining the required temperature takes little energy because microbes produce heat as they work, and the only outputs are water and tiny levels of carbon dioxide — each microbe produces only 0.01 per cent of its own infinitesimal weight in carbon dioxide, said Burd.

Sphingomonas
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sphingomonas
order:
http://www.dsmz.de/microorganisms/html/strains/strain.dsm013477.html

Pseudomonas
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudomonas

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 May 2008 12:02 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  1896
Joined  2006-09-25

Skilluminati Roundup

Big Thinkpiece:
http://www.skilluminati.com/research/entry/dreaming_5gw_invisible_war/

Background Questions:
http://www.skilluminati.com/research/entry/5gwhat_the_meaning_of_warfare_in_2008/

The Language of Power:
http://www.skilluminati.com/research/entry/the_language_of_power/
http://www.skilluminati.com/research/entry/the_language_of_power_ii/

Dangerous Information:
http://www.skilluminati.com/research/entry/the_irreversible_problem_of_dangerous_information/

John Boyd:
http://www.skilluminati.com/research/entry/time_as_a_weapon_john_boyd/
http://www.skilluminati.com/research/entry/get_familiar_with_john_boyd/

Profile
 
 
Posted: 06 October 2008 11:42 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]
Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  135
Joined  2007-04-29

John Robb is on a hot streak right now, providing some of the most relevant analysis of the world financial situation.

Mark Pesce also has a new, quite long, article up.

P.S. Thanks for turning me on to Global Guerrillas in the first place, thirtyseven; an incredibly valuable resource.

 Signature 

Snakes eating frogs, toads eating gnats;
When the spaceship beams you up, boy, get drunk fast

Profile
 
 
Posted: 06 October 2008 11:43 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  1896
Joined  2006-09-25

Thanks for reminding me that John Robb exists, I haven’t checked out his site since I stopped doing 5GW on Skilluminati.

Profile