Was just giving this site a reread now that I have some downtime.
You can still see how much the conspiracy community has been infected with this virus when you listen to people as Alex Jones: Illuminati this, New World Order that, David Rockefeller evil, United Nations equates communism, globalism equates collectivism, etc. There’s much they don’t (want to) understand and, ironically, maybe even more than the average citizen, their opinions have been formed by decades of propaganda and disinformation. Isn’t that the ultimate irony?
The rules are something like this:
America’s hard right exposes the Eastern Establishment for being a bunch of communists.
Members of the pro-Saudi oil Eastern Establishment and America’s anti-Zionist hard right expose the intrigues of Israel, most notably nuclear spying and the U.S.S. Liberty incident.
Zionists expose the tradional anti-Israel and pro-Saudi oil role of the Eastern Establishment.
Oligarchs in exile expose the wrongdoings of Putin & Co.Get the picture?
....
By the way, some people seem to think that this information has been uploaded because I would be bitter or angry about this lack of support. While I am a little disappointed in the persons discussed above, the major reason for posting this information here is to give people some healthy perspective on their favorite “truth seekers”. Researchers often do not give their opinion on fellow-researcher unless they have something positive to say. I entirely disagree with that habit. As long as the discussions are polite and rational, distrust and differences of opinion should be voiced as much as possible, as in this way other researchers are forced to explain their writings or actions. What the conspiracy community needs most of all is transparancy, and keeping my opinions and experiences to myself out of a misplaced feeling of courtesy would go against everything this site is trying to achieve.
What’s your relation to Lyndon LaRouche’s organizations, mainly Executive Intelligence Review?
I’m not a member, nor will I ever be. They have supported some of my work and therefore I’ve kept in contact with one of the members to whom I’ve regularly passed information in return for small favors (sometimes with success, sometimes not). Although their information can be intriguing, I often disagree with their point of view. At the very least it would be nice if EIR focused more on presenting evidence, instead of spewing their dogma that the British are behind every subversive political movement on the planet. The members’ strict adherence to LaRouche’s dogma can indeed make me a bit uncomfortable during conversations, as it sometimes seems as if you are talking to a robot or public relations officer instead of a real, independent, thinking person. All this having been said, I’ve never caught EIR writers inventing facts. It has always been their conclusions that I doubt.
Also from Cryptome:
http://cryptome.org/wikileaks-note3.htm
On the CIA accusation: not by me, although I have warned
that any leaks site is very likely to be co-opted by the spies.
It is common spy tradecraft to do that, as applied to journalism,
media, education, churches, government and so on.If you have not read thme my publication of emails among the
founders and supporters of Wikileaks tells more concisely
than I can prattle here about our parting:http://cryptome.info/wikileaks-leak.htm
Even so, this prattle:
To protect against co-optation, the operator(s) of a leaks site
should not be anonymous. Nor should a leaks site conceal its
financial and support capabilities. That mimics and validates the
behavior of secretkeepers.Whistleblowers should run their own leaks site, and bear
the consequences. Otherwise they help perpetuate the
faults of unaccountable behavior, again following those
who operate in the shadows.Peddling of leaks, true and manufactured, has become a
racket in the media and on the web, an outgrowth of excessive
secrecy and not least, the campaign for and against it.A vast increase in secrecy has come from the institution of
freedom of information policies and politics. Leaks are
a way of valorizing the leaked information whether true
or false, most often deliberately commingled. Redaction
now a necessary cosmetic for enticement. These too
are common spy tradecraft.The ancient concept of secrecy has become useless for
protection of information due to its arcanity, high cost and
confused implementation.There are thousands of types of and regulations for classification
of protected information, not just the few publicized, so many that
implementators cannot figure out how to abide them, so they
do so by indiscriminate broadcasting which inevitably leads to
leaks.This fosters overclassification and indeed leads to diminution
the usefulness of information protection by making it difficult
for cleared personnel to gain access to what is sought—the
cases of US UK and ES terrorist attacks in point.Leaks are not the answer, nor does twiddling with classification
offer a way out.Absolute openness is the answer, hear the screams of outrage,
a standard to be followed by the abettors of leaks, and, to repeat,
most abettors of leaks are camouflaged secretkeepers, some
witting some not, out to breed suspicion and doubt in order to
boost their own particular axe-grind, reputation and credibility,
aw shucks: to boost sales and income.Just doing my part for that ancient duplicity of deity promulgators.
For highest of motives, totally selfless you understand. Mind
lending a fiver until payday?
Jeff Wells also has written a great deal about 9/11 and how many former military/intelligence officers came out with their own exotic no-plane theories.
