Bolivia: Colonialism understood as a sickness
Posted: 02 March 2009 03:50 AM   [ Ignore ]
Welcome
Avatar
Rank
Total Posts:  48
Joined  2008-06-06

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-02/uog-bcu022709.php

When Evo Morales, Bolivia’s first president of Indian origin, was appointed in 2006 he initiated a “decolonising revolution”.

In a new thesis in social anthropology at the University of Gothenburg, Anders Burman examines how the Government policy for decolonization has been interwoven with the rituals and cosmology of the indigenous population.

For the indigenous population in the Bolivian Andes, colonialism was not something that was consigned to history when Bolivia was founded. Their exploitation and marginalisation simply took on new forms.

Eyebrows are sometimes raised when the indigenous population makes the claim today that their fight is a struggle for decolonization, says Anders Burman, who is defending his thesis at the School of Global Studies. He carried out his ethnographic field work among shamans and activists within the Andean indigenous people’s movement.

For the people with and among whom I have been working, colonialism is something that is very much alive – in everything from the educational system to the special position of the Catholic Church. It also transpired that colonialism and decolonization are processes of existential significance for many young people of Indian origin.

‘Colonialism’ and ‘decolonization’ are themes that have been thoroughly discussed in postcolonial studies. However, according to Anders Burman, the discussions are often abstract and are rarely based on people’s own life worlds. His thesis however shows that colonialism and decolonization are experienced and explained in different ways by different actors. The Government views colonialism as something that permeates political structures and is therefore pursuing a policy to change these structures. For the activists in the indigenous movement, Bolivia is itself a colonial project and decolonization would be tantamount to demolishing Bolivia and building a new country. But for the shamans and their apprentices with whom Anders Burman has been working most intensively, colonialism and decolonization are understood differently.

I have studied how they perceive colonialism to be a ‘sickness’ and decolonization as the ‘cure’, and how, based on certain cosmological assumptions, they are working to decolonize society, the landscape, the state and ‘the self’.

Anders Burman also discovered interesting parallels between activism and shamanism.

In many respects the activism and the ritual practices derive from the same interpretive cultural framework. Furthermore, both activism and shamanism have a lot to do with conduct towards that which is understood as alien, regardless of whether it is a national power elite that is perceived as foreign, or unfamiliar spirits that bring about illness.

To understand what colonialism and decolonization mean to his informants, Anders Burman was compelled to enter into the depths of the shamans’ life worlds and relate them to larger political processes in the country.

Today traditional Andean cosmology is one of the cornerstones in the Government’s so-called ‘decolonising revolution’, but I reverse the perspective and examine how colonialism and decolonization are understood with a starting point in Andean cosmology.

###

Title of the thesis: As though we had no spirit: Ritual, politics and existence in the Aymara quest for decolonization.

Name of faculty opponent: Professor Sinclair Thomson, New York

 Signature 

As long as you don’t quit or die, you don’t fail.

Whatever doesn’t work 100 percent of the time needs to be fine tuned, if it can’t be fine tuned then it needs to be dropped

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 March 2009 08:18 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  1566
Joined  2006-09-25

Absolutely.  I’m amazed how much white folks expect colonialism to be over as soon as it’s over...there is, of course, no possible reason why the effects would linger longer than a couple weeks, right? 

I find myself wondering if the average american cracker is non-colonized or just self-colonized.  After all, most of us are functionally the underclass for the original global colonial movement of Capitalist Christianity, so it’s not like we were ever immune or un-affected, we’ve just always had an Other ever lower on the totem pole than ourselves.  Many hundreds of different Others, really.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 06 March 2009 07:41 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  113
Joined  2007-05-15

new meaning to ‘Colonial America’.

 Signature 

3+O(

Profile
 
 
   
 
 
‹‹ The Line      Anybody noticed lesswrong yet? ››